DOI: https://doi.org/10.25040/medicallaw2018.01.022
Med. pravo., 2018; 1(21): 22-31
UDС: 347.440
ILYUSHCHENKOVA KATERYNA OLEHIVNA
postgraduate (PhD student) of the National Prosecution Academy of Ukraine
A Contract as a Ground for Legal Relations of Donation Emergence
The article investigates a contract as a reason for creating the legal relations
of donorship and as one of the possible ways of formalizing informed consent.
The author distinguishes a specific object of civil legal relations and a subject of
the contracts in the sphere of donorship, their source of origin being a human
organism, i.e. human biological material and/or actions of removing human
biological material. The peculiarities of the legal relations of donorship, that
make them different from other civil legal relations, are mentioned. In addition,
two types of contracts in the sphere of donorship are distinguished – a contract
of donorship and a contract for the removal of human biological material. The
criterion for categorizing the abovementioned contracts is the parties to a
contract that in their turn depend on the physiological state of the donor and
the criterion of anonymousness. The contents of the contracts are considered,
as well as their subjects, essential and general provisions. It is defined that
the form of the contracts in the sphere of donorship is written. The notions
“a contract of donorship” and “a contract for the removal of human biological
material” are defined.
Key words: donor, donorship, contract, biological material.
Reference list:
1. Marhatskaya N. A. (1980) Hrazhdansko-pravovye voprosy transplantatsyy y donorstva. N. A. Marhatskaya. Vestnyk MHU. Seryya 11. p. 24.
2. Shyshka R. (2006) Vytoky ta teoretychni zasady rozvytku kontseptsiyi dohovoru v suchasnykh umovakh. R. Shyshka. Suchasni problemy adaptatsiyi tsyvilnoho zakonodavstva do standartiv Yevropeyskoho Soyuzu. Materialy I Mizhn. nauk.-metod. konf. (m. Lviv, 16.03.2006 r.) Lviv. p. 404–410.
3. Lidovets R. A. (2005) Zmishani dohovory v tsyvilnomu pravi Ukrayiny. dys. kand. yuryd. nauk. R. A. Lidovets. Lviv. p. 184.
4. Buletsa S.B. (2016) Tsyvilni pravovidnosyny, shcho vynykayut u sferi zdiysnennya medychnoyi diyalnosti: teoretychni ta praktychni problemy dys. d-ra yuryd. nauk. S. B. Buletsa. Odesa. p. 437.
5. Punda O.O. (2005) Ponyattya ta problemy zdiysnennya osobystykh nemaynovykh prav, shcho zabezpechuyut pryrodne isnuvannya lyudyny monohrafiya. O. O. Punda. K. Vyd-vo S. Pantyuka, 2005. p. 436.
6. Musiyenko A. V. (2010) Zapobihannya zlochynam u sferi transplantatsiyi orhaniv ta tkanyn lyudyny avtoref. dys. kand. yuryd. nauk. A. V. Musiyenko. K., p. 17.
7. Olkhovyk L. A. (2016) Pravove rehulyuvannya transplantolohiyi v Ukrayini. L. A. Olkhovyk, A. D. Remenyak. Porivnyalno-analitychne pravo. 5. p. 114–116.
8. Zazulyak I. I. (2009) Istotni umovy dohovoru: teoretychnyy aspekt. dys. kand. yuryd. nauk. I. I. Zazulyak. Kh., p. 170.
9. Havze V.Y. (1968) Obyazatelstvennoe pravo (obshchye polozhenyya). V. Y. Havze. Mynsk Yzd-vo BHU ym. V.Y. Lenyna, 1968. p. 126.
10. Stryzhak V. I. (2010) Problema vyznachennya ponyattya predmet dohovoru. I. V. Stryzhak. Visnyk Akademiyi mytnoyi sluzhby Ukrayiny. 2. p. 124–129.
11. Stefanchuk R. O. (2009) Tsyvilne pravo Ukrayiny navchalnyy posibnyk. R. O. Stefanchuk. K. Pravova yednist. p. 535.
12. Borodovskyy S. O. (2005) Ukladennya, zmina ta rozirvannya dohovoru u tsyvilnomu pravi Ukrayiny. avtoref. dys kand. yuryd. nauk. S. O. Borodovskyy. Kh., p 20.
